I have a short paper appearing next month in the Journal of Public Deliberation. A preview is available here. Below is a precis. In its first half, “Cultivating Deliberation for Democracy” discusses the failure of “deliberation technologies” to substantially improve public deliberation in either quantity or quality. To be sure, new technologies have made possible [...]
Archive for the ‘Deliberation’ Category
“Cultivating Deliberation for Democracy”
Posted in Collective Wisdom, Deliberation, Democracy, Wisdom of Crowds, YourView on March 12, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
The dismal state of political discourse
Posted in Deliberation, Democracy, Wisdom of Crowds, YourView on February 26, 2012 | 4 Comments »
Two perceptive comments on the state of democracy in Australia, from yesterday’s Age. First Barry Jones laments the dismal state of political discourse: I have been heavily involved in politics all my adult life and the current national situation, both in the government and opposition, is a low point, the lowest I can recall – even [...]
What Do We Think? available
Posted in Collective Wisdom, Decision Making, Deliberation, Deliberative Polling, Opinion, Sustainability, Wisdom of Crowds on November 17, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
A new draft of What Do We Think? Divining the Public Wisdom to Guide Sustainability Decisions is now available. Download PDF
What do we think? Part 3: A virtual forum, and why it might work
Posted in Collective Wisdom, Deliberation, Deliberative Polling, Democracy, Opinion, Polling, Sustainability, Wisdom of Crowds on October 15, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
List the features you’d want to see in a mechanism for identifying public wisdom. These requirements mean the mechanism would have to be internet based – i.e. a kind of national virtual forum. Such a forum would face a range of major challenges, but there’s reason to think these could be handled.
What do we think? Part 2: Why we should know but don’t
Posted in Collective Wisdom, Deliberation, Deliberative Polling, Democracy, Opinion, Polling, Sustainability, Wisdom of Crowds on October 14, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
We need the public wisdom because politically it would help governments make decisions; and on some issues would be the best guide to what the right decision would be. However we almost never know what the public wisdom is. Deliberative polling is our best current mechanism for finding out, but is too cumbersome and expensive to fully meet the need.
What do we think? Part 1: Public Attitude versus Public Wisdom
Posted in Collective Wisdom, Deliberation, Deliberative Polling, Democracy, Opinion, Polling, Sustainability, Wisdom of Crowds on October 14, 2011 | 3 Comments »
Governments must make lots of decisions for Australia to make a smooth and timely transition to sustainability. Those decisions are constrained by public opinion; therefore we need to know what the public thinks. Standard opinion polls identify the public attitude, which falls far short of the public wisdom.
Four Grades of Collective Wisdom
Posted in Collective Wisdom, Deliberation, Deliberative Polling, Wisdom of Crowds on August 16, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Much of what Austhink does these days is concerned with “collective wisdom” – the knowledge that a group as a whole has. As Surowiecki famously pointed out, when the conditions are right, the wisdom of the group can be superior to that of the individuals making it up. However finding out what that collective [...]
Ask a stupid question…
Posted in Belief, Climate Change, Deliberation, Democracy, Opinion, Polling on June 3, 2011 | 7 Comments »
A new national poll finds: “A clear majority of Australian electors oppose the Gillard Government’s plan to introduce a carbon tax, 37% support the proposed carbon tax and 10% can’t say.” “A majority (64%) believes that Australia’s proposed carbon tax will make no difference to the world’s climate.” Political scientist James Fishkin, in his landmark [...]
Layered visual argument
Posted in Argument, Argumentation, Deliberation, Reasoning, Visual Deliberation on April 4, 2011 | 1 Comment »
A brilliant cartoon presents four arguments visually, and its main argument implicitly.
Arguing is not pointless…
Posted in Argument, Argumentation, Deliberation on February 11, 2011 | 6 Comments »
Peter Bregmen in Harvard Business Review argues that arguing is pointless. Arguing is of course not pointless, but must be done tactfully – as explained by Benjamin Franklin.
YourView in brief
Email list
Sign up for occasional emails about new posts or other news
Tweets
- How to write an opinion piece: rewrite an Economist piece. theage.com.au/business/austr… via @theage 2 hours ago
- Causal inferences about climate require relevant comparisons. Not pseudoskeptics' bogus comparisons. wp.me/ppLOn-iO 16 hours ago
Can this be true?- Oh wait that's a "t"Last year, the Federal Reserve allowed Bank of America to move a huge portfolio of dangerous bets into a side of the company that happens to be FDIC-insured, putting all of us on the hook for as much as $55 trillion in irresponsible gambles.
- Education don't helpAnd here’s the mind-blowing surprise: For Republicans, having a college degree didn’t appear to make one any more open to what scientists have to say. On the contrary, better-educated Republicans were more skeptical of modern climate science than their less educated brethren. Only 19 percent of college-educated Republicans agreed that the planet is warming d […]
- Oh wait that's a "t"
-
Level 50, 120 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000 Ph +61 3 9225 5215 Publications
- Critical Snippets
-
Top Posts
Categories
- ACH
- AI
- Analysis of Competing Hypotheses
- Analytics
- Argument
- Argument infographics
- Argument Mapping
- Argumentation
- Assumptions
- Austhink
- bCisive
- Belief
- Blogging
- Boards
- Business
- Business Intelligence
- Climate Change
- Cognition
- Collective Wisdom
- Communication
- Consciousness
- Critical Thinking
- Data Visualization
- Datacentrism
- Decision Making
- Decision mapping
- Decision Mapping Book
- Deliberation
- Deliberative Polling
- Democracy
- Dialogue Mapping
- Education
- Evidence
- Evidence-based decision
- Expertise
- Explanation
- Global warming
- Grouping
- Hypothesis mapping
- Hypothesis Testing
- IBIS
- Intelligence
- Intelligence Augmentation
- Intuition
- JFK
- Language
- Legal Argumentation
- Management consulting
- Mapping
- MECE
- Medical decision making
- Metacognition
- Mindfulness
- Moral algebra
- Observation
- Opinion
- Paul Monk
- Philosophy
- Planning
- Polling
- Problem Solving
- Project management
- Rationale
- Rationale Consensus
- Reasoning
- Research
- Risk
- Skepticism
- Software Startup
- Statistics
- Strategy
- Sustainability
- Teaching
- Thinking
- Truthiness
- Uncategorized
- Visual Deliberation
- Visualization
- Wicked Problems
- Wisdom
- Wisdom of Crowds
- YourView
Meta
