In his recent post “To accept or to decline: mapping life’s little dilemmas using IBIS“, Kailash Awati provides a nice case study of using mapping to make a significant personal decision. Interestingly, the “little dilemma” in the case study is just the same kind of issue that was facing Joseph Priestley when he wrote to Benjamin Franklin asking for his advice, resulting in Franklin’s famous letter describing his “moral algebra”. Like most people, when reading Franklin’s letter I didn’t bother to ask what exactly was bothering Priestley so much that he would beg for Franklin’s advice. As described in Steven Johnson’s excellent book The Invention of Air, Priestley was deliberating over whether to accept a particular job offer. And as I discuss here, Franklin’s two-column pro/con method, for all its virtues, is just too simple to accommodate the true complexity of deliberative decision making. Awati’s case study illustrates how the moral algebra can be extended to embrace this complexity while retaining clarity by using the IBIS methodology and supporting software such as Compendium or bCisive.
How to think about a job offer
August 13, 2010 by Tim van Gelder
Posted in Decision Making, Decision mapping, Deliberation, Moral algebra | Leave a Comment
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
YourView in brief
YourView divines collective wisdom on major public issues.Email list
Sign up for occasional emails about new posts or other news
Tweets
- How to write an opinion piece: rewrite an Economist piece. theage.com.au/business/austr… via @theage 2 hours ago
- Causal inferences about climate require relevant comparisons. Not pseudoskeptics' bogus comparisons. wp.me/ppLOn-iO 15 hours ago
Can this be true?- Oh wait that's a "t"Last year, the Federal Reserve allowed Bank of America to move a huge portfolio of dangerous bets into a side of the company that happens to be FDIC-insured, putting all of us on the hook for as much as $55 trillion in irresponsible gambles.
- Education don't helpAnd here’s the mind-blowing surprise: For Republicans, having a college degree didn’t appear to make one any more open to what scientists have to say. On the contrary, better-educated Republicans were more skeptical of modern climate science than their less educated brethren. Only 19 percent of college-educated Republicans agreed that the planet is warming d […]
- Oh wait that's a "t"
Publications
See my publications database for information about and PDF versions of most of my recent writings.
Critical Snippets-
Top Posts
Categories
- ACH
- AI
- Analysis of Competing Hypotheses
- Analytics
- Argument
- Argument infographics
- Argument Mapping
- Argumentation
- Assumptions
- Austhink
- bCisive
- Belief
- Blogging
- Boards
- Business
- Business Intelligence
- Climate Change
- Cognition
- Collective Wisdom
- Communication
- Consciousness
- Critical Thinking
- Data Visualization
- Datacentrism
- Decision Making
- Decision mapping
- Decision Mapping Book
- Deliberation
- Deliberative Polling
- Democracy
- Dialogue Mapping
- Education
- Evidence
- Evidence-based decision
- Expertise
- Explanation
- Global warming
- Grouping
- Hypothesis mapping
- Hypothesis Testing
- IBIS
- Intelligence
- Intelligence Augmentation
- Intuition
- JFK
- Language
- Legal Argumentation
- Management consulting
- Mapping
- MECE
- Medical decision making
- Metacognition
- Mindfulness
- Moral algebra
- Observation
- Opinion
- Paul Monk
- Philosophy
- Planning
- Polling
- Problem Solving
- Project management
- Rationale
- Rationale Consensus
- Reasoning
- Research
- Risk
- Skepticism
- Software Startup
- Statistics
- Strategy
- Sustainability
- Teaching
- Thinking
- Truthiness
- Uncategorized
- Visual Deliberation
- Visualization
- Wicked Problems
- Wisdom
- Wisdom of Crowds
- YourView
Meta
